Yep, we may get a tiny thank-you (read: commission) when you buy through links on Soundfindr — not enough for a yacht, but enough to keep the lights (and servers) on. Learn more
49 Highlights 36 Differences 8 Reactions 0 Likes
beyerdynamic M 201 vs Shure SM57: 49 Highlights & 36 Differences — So, Which Microphone Actually Works Better
Understand each mic’s professional perks simply. Make an informed purchase decision. Which one’s right for your setup — beyerdynamic M 201 or Shure SM57? We’ve compared their connection interface, power source, onboard controls & stand/tripod, usability, and sound so you can choose the better microphone.
Beyerdynamic M 201 vs Shure SM57: A Detailed Comparison of Classic Dynamic Microphones
Both the beyerdynamic M 201 and the Shure SM57 are professional handheld dynamic microphones favored for studio, live, and broadcast applications. Each is tailored to capture instruments and vocals with high fidelity, featuring a robust XLR connection and passive power source. While they share core traits like a durable build and professional-grade quality, their distinct polar patterns and accessory bundles set them apart, catering to slightly different recording needs and user preferences.
Distinctive Traits of the Beyerdynamic M 201: Precision and Isolation
The beyerdynamic M 201 is engineered with a hypercardioid polar pattern that excels in isolating sound sources within noisy environments by focusing on a narrow pickup area. This makes it particularly advantageous in settings where spill and ambient noise rejection are crucial. The microphone sports a small capsule diameter of 0.94 inches and a streamlined height of 5.79 inches, supporting ease of placement and handling.
One notable feature is its built-in hum-compensating coil, which minimizes interference from electrical hums, enhancing clarity without needing additional noise reduction tools. Connectivity-wise, it offers a detachable cable, affording users convenience and cost-efficiency when replacing cables or setups. However, it lacks some rig-related features like swivel or drop resistance, and its mount is detachable but not swivel-enabled, which might limit flexibility during rapid stage adjustments.
While its accessory package is modest; providing a carrying case, mounting clip, and adapters; it excludes cables and a microphone stand or tripod, highlighting a focus on essential components without extra frills. The M 201 carries a typical 2-year warranty and meets safety and environmental standards but does not come with professional broadcast certification.
Priced at around $449.99 at beyerdynamic, this microphone is a premium choice aimed at users who prioritize directionality and sound integrity in challenging acoustic environments.
The Shure SM57: Rugged Versatility And Industry-Endorsed Reliability
The Shure SM57 holds a legendary reputation in sound reinforcement and recording circles, backed by its cardioid pattern that balances effective sound capture with rejection of off-axis noise, suitable for a broad range of instruments and vocals. Slightly larger, it measures 6.18 inches in height, providing a familiar feel to professionals accustomed to classic dynamic microphones.
Durability is a significant trait for the SM57, featuring drop resistance and compatibility with swivel or pivot stands (swivel capability), ideal for dynamic stage environments and quick repositioning. Its non-detachable cable limits cable replacement options but is offset by an extensive accessory kit that includes cables, a mounting clip, adapters, and a stand/tripod; covering most setup needs right out of the box.
For budget-conscious users and pros looking for a versatile, rugged mic without sacrificing quality, the Shure SM57 is accessible at around $109 at Sam Ash, making it an unbeatable value proposition.
Quick Take
The beyerdynamic M 201 shines with its hypercardioid pattern and hum-compensating coil, delivering precise sound isolation alongside a handy detachable cable design. Meanwhile, the Shure SM57 impresses with rugged build quality, extensive accessory options, and a professional broadcast pedigree; all at a fraction of the price.
Bottom Line
If you need pinpoint directional accuracy and are willing to invest in a microphone optimized for minimizing ambient noise, the beyerdynamic M 201 is a smart pick. However, for most professionals and hobbyists seeking a versatile, durable, and widely trusted microphone with a comprehensive accessory setup and excellent cost efficiency, the Shure SM57 remains an industry favorite and a reliable choice.
Verdict
Winner: Shure SM57 - Due to its robust design, broad application range, professional broadcast certification, and unbeatable value.
Runner-up: beyerdynamic M 201 - For specialized users focused on isolation and noise rejection in complex environments, willing to pay a premium.
Side by side. The numbers. The features. No drama.
We stacked every sound, control, and tech detail between beyerdynamic M 201 and Shure SM57. This side-by-side microphones review highlights what really matters — and what might surprise you.
The Polar Pattern Type differs between the beyerdynamic M 201 and the Shure SM57. The M 201 features a Hypercardioid pattern, while the SM57 has a Cardioid pattern. The M 201 offers tighter off-axis rejection, making it better suited for isolating sound sources.
Identifies the default pickup pattern.
In the battle of Polar Pattern Type, beyerdynamic M 201 ◉ is better than Shure SM57 ◉ , delivering higher 22 score measurement.
Based on community votes for Polar Pattern Type, beyerdynamic M 201 ◉ earned 1 votes, more than Shure SM57 ◉, which got 0 votes.
The hypercardioid polar pattern on the beyerdynamic M 201 really gives it an edge in isolating sounds which is clutch in noisy setups making it my choice over the cardioid on the Shure SM57.
The Intended Use for beyerdynamic M 201 includes Studio, Live, Broadcast, and Instrument applications, while the Shure SM57 covers Studio, Live, Podcast, Broadcast, Instrument, and Streaming. The SM57 offers a slightly broader use case, particularly adding podcast and streaming.
Describes the primary application area.
In the battle of Intended Use, beyerdynamic M 201 ◉ is better than Shure SM57 ◉ , delivering higher 9 score measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Intended Use on beyerdynamic M 201 ◉ vs Shure SM57 ◉ and help others decide!
Both beyerdynamic M 201 and Shure SM57 have a Handheld Form Factor, making them equally portable and easy to handle during performances or recordings. This format suits vocalists and instrument applications well for both microphones.
Describes the physical style of the microphone.
In the battle of Form Factor, beyerdynamic M 201 ◉ is better than Shure SM57 ◉ , delivering higher 7 score measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Form Factor on beyerdynamic M 201 ◉ vs Shure SM57 ◉ and help others decide!
Both beyerdynamic M 201 and Shure SM57 are designed for Professional user skill levels. This means they cater to experienced users seeking high-quality audio capture for demanding environments.
Recommended audience expertise level.
In the battle of User Skill Level, beyerdynamic M 201 ◉ is worse than Shure SM57 ◉ , delivering lower 3 score measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the User Skill Level on beyerdynamic M 201 ◉ vs Shure SM57 ◉ and help others decide!
Neither beyerdynamic M 201 nor Shure SM57 is a Limited Edition model as both are standard production microphones. This makes both options readily available without exclusivity affecting purchase decisions.
Whether the model is a limited or special release.
In the battle of Limited Edition, beyerdynamic M 201 ◉ is same as Shure SM57 ◉ .
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Limited Edition on beyerdynamic M 201 ◉ vs Shure SM57 ◉ and help others decide!
Product Type
What is the product type?
56 beyerdynamic M 201 0Votes Dynamic
29 Shure SM57 0Votes Dynamic
Shure SM57
Dynamic microphones like the SM57 are known for their durability and versatility, often used for vocals, instruments, and live events.
Defines the basic category of the microphone.
In the battle of Product Type, beyerdynamic M 201 ◉ is better than Shure SM57 ◉ , delivering higher 27 score measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Product Type on beyerdynamic M 201 ◉ vs Shure SM57 ◉ and help others decide!
Year of Release
What year was it released?
0 beyerdynamic M 201 0Votes 1960
0 Shure SM57 0Votes 1965
Shure SM57
First introduced in 1965, the SM57 has become a standard in the music industry, known for its rugged design and exceptional sound clarity.
Indicates when the microphone was launched.
In the battle of Year of Release, beyerdynamic M 201 ◉ is same as Shure SM57 ◉ .
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Year of Release on beyerdynamic M 201 ◉ vs Shure SM57 ◉ and help others decide!
Country of Origin
What is the country of origin?
76 beyerdynamic M 201 0Votes Germany
79 Shure SM57 0Votes United States
Shure SM57
Manufactured in the USA, the SM57 continues to be a staple in both professional and home recording setups worldwide.
Manufacturing or design origin.
In the battle of Country of Origin, beyerdynamic M 201 ◉ is worse than Shure SM57 ◉ , delivering lower 3 score measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Country of Origin on beyerdynamic M 201 ◉ vs Shure SM57 ◉ and help others decide!
Compatibility
Which devices or platforms are compatible?
39 beyerdynamic M 201 0Votes PC, Mac, Mixer, Audio Interface
57 Shure SM57 0Votes PC, Mac, iOS, Android, Mixer, Camera
Shure SM57
Works with a wide range of devices and systems, including personal computers, mobile devices, and professional mixers or cameras.
Lists supported platforms and devices.
In the battle of Compatibility, beyerdynamic M 201 ◉ is worse than Shure SM57 ◉ , delivering lower 18 score measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Compatibility on beyerdynamic M 201 ◉ vs Shure SM57 ◉ and help others decide!
Mounting Type
What is the mounting type?
39 beyerdynamic M 201 0Votes Clip, Stand, Boom Arm
44 Shure SM57 0Votes Stand, Boom Arm
Shure SM57
The SM57 can be mounted on a standard microphone stand or boom arm, providing flexibility for studio and live setups.
The typical mounting or support style.
In the battle of Mounting Type, beyerdynamic M 201 ◉ is worse than Shure SM57 ◉ , delivering lower 5 score measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Mounting Type on beyerdynamic M 201 ◉ vs Shure SM57 ◉ and help others decide!
Model Name
What is the model name?
63 beyerdynamic M 201 0Votes M 201
52 Shure SM57 0Votes SM57
The specific product identifier from the manufacturer.
In the battle of Model Name, beyerdynamic M 201 ◉ is better than Shure SM57 ◉ , delivering higher 11 score measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Model Name on beyerdynamic M 201 ◉ vs Shure SM57 ◉ and help others decide!
Series/Line
What series/line does it belong to?
46 beyerdynamic M 201 0Votes M Series
68 Shure SM57 0Votes SM Series
Identifies the product line or collection the microphone belongs to.
In the battle of Series/Line, beyerdynamic M 201 ◉ is worse than Shure SM57 ◉ , delivering lower 22 score measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Series/Line on beyerdynamic M 201 ◉ vs Shure SM57 ◉ and help others decide!
Connectivity Type
What is the connectivity type?
21 beyerdynamic M 201 0Votes Wired, XLR
9 Shure SM57 0Votes Wired
Defines how the microphone connects to devices.
In the battle of Connectivity Type, beyerdynamic M 201 ◉ is better than Shure SM57 ◉ , delivering higher 12 score measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Connectivity Type on beyerdynamic M 201 ◉ vs Shure SM57 ◉ and help others decide!
Color Options
What are the color options?
36 beyerdynamic M 201 0Votes Black
69 Shure SM57 0Votes Black
Available product colors.
In the battle of Color Options, beyerdynamic M 201 ◉ is worse than Shure SM57 ◉ , delivering lower 33 score measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Color Options on beyerdynamic M 201 ◉ vs Shure SM57 ◉ and help others decide!
Gender Target
What is the gender target?
86 beyerdynamic M 201 0Votes Unisex
89 Shure SM57 0Votes Unisex
The marketing target by gender (if specified).
In the battle of Gender Target, beyerdynamic M 201 ◉ is worse than Shure SM57 ◉ , delivering lower 3 score measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Gender Target on beyerdynamic M 201 ◉ vs Shure SM57 ◉ and help others decide!
Age Group
What is the age group?
66 beyerdynamic M 201 0Votes Adult, Professional
54 Shure SM57 0Votes Adult, Professional
The intended user age bracket.
In the battle of Age Group, beyerdynamic M 201 ◉ is better than Shure SM57 ◉ , delivering higher 12 score measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Age Group on beyerdynamic M 201 ◉ vs Shure SM57 ◉ and help others decide!
Recording Application Category
What recording applications is it best for?
44 beyerdynamic M 201 0Votes Studio, Live, Broadcast
In the battle of Recording Application Category, beyerdynamic M 201 ◉ is worse than Shure SM57 ◉ , delivering lower 18 score measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Recording Application Category on beyerdynamic M 201 ◉ vs Shure SM57 ◉ and help others decide!
Launch Region
Where is it available?
86 beyerdynamic M 201 0Votes Global
89 Shure SM57 0Votes Global
Where the product is primarily available.
In the battle of Launch Region, beyerdynamic M 201 ◉ is worse than Shure SM57 ◉ , delivering lower 3 score measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Launch Region on beyerdynamic M 201 ◉ vs Shure SM57 ◉ and help others decide!
The Height of beyerdynamic M 201 is 5.79 inches compared to the Shure SM57's 6.18 inches, making the SM57 slightly taller by 0.39 inches. This slight size difference may impact fit in tight spaces but both remain easy to handle.
The microphone’s overall height.
In the battle of Height, beyerdynamic M 201 ◉ is better than Shure SM57 ◉ , delivering lower 0.4 inch measurement.
Based on community votes for Height, beyerdynamic M 201 ◉ earned 1 votes, more than Shure SM57 ◉, which got 0 votes.
Who knows? 0Votes Shure SM57 (Help us out by suggesting one!)
vs Capsule Diameter
beyerdynamic M 201 has a Capsule Diameter of 0.94 inches, while the Shure SM57 does not provide this specification. The M 201's known smaller capsule diameter might affect directional characteristics and frequency response.
The diameter of the microphone capsule.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Capsule Diameter on beyerdynamic M 201 ◉ vs Shure SM57 ◉ and help others decide!
Width
What is the width?
0.94 inch 0Votes
1.25 inch 0Votes
beyerdynamic M 201
That’s about 2.4 cm, roughly the width of a lipstick tube—slim and easy to position on crowded drum kits or guitar cabs.
The microphone’s overall width.
In the battle of Width, beyerdynamic M 201 ◉ is better than Shure SM57 ◉ , delivering lower 0.3 inch measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Width on beyerdynamic M 201 ◉ vs Shure SM57 ◉ and help others decide!
Weight
What is the weight?
0.5 lbs 0Votes
0.63 lbs 0Votes
beyerdynamic M 201
Around 0.23 kg, about the same weight as a smartphone in a case—light enough to stay secure on slim mic stands.
The microphone’s physical weight.
In the battle of Weight, beyerdynamic M 201 ◉ is better than Shure SM57 ◉ , delivering lower 0.1 lbs measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Weight on beyerdynamic M 201 ◉ vs Shure SM57 ◉ and help others decide!
Grill Diameter
What is the grill diameter?
0.94 inch 0Votes
2.5 inch 0Votes
beyerdynamic M 201
Same 2.4 cm, matches the capsule diameter for a tight, narrow pickup zone.
The diameter of the protective microphone grill.
In the battle of Grill Diameter, beyerdynamic M 201 ◉ is worse than Shure SM57 ◉ , delivering lower 1.6 inch measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Grill Diameter on beyerdynamic M 201 ◉ vs Shure SM57 ◉ and help others decide!
Mounting Thread Size
What is the mounting thread size?
66 beyerdynamic M 201 0Votes 3/8"
69 Shure SM57 0Votes 5/8"
beyerdynamic M 201
Standard European mic thread size, often adapted to 5/8" for US stands (adapter usually included).
The thread size for mounting compatibility.
In the battle of Mounting Thread Size, beyerdynamic M 201 ◉ is worse than Shure SM57 ◉ , delivering lower 3 score measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Mounting Thread Size on beyerdynamic M 201 ◉ vs Shure SM57 ◉ and help others decide!
Depth
What is the depth?
0.94 inch 0Votes
1.25 inch 0Votes
The microphone’s overall depth.
In the battle of Depth, beyerdynamic M 201 ◉ is better than Shure SM57 ◉ , delivering lower 0.3 inch measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Depth on beyerdynamic M 201 ◉ vs Shure SM57 ◉ and help others decide!
Package Width
What is the package width?
Who knows? 0Votes beyerdynamic M 201 (Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows? 0Votes Shure SM57 (Help us out by suggesting one!)
The shipping package’s width.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Package Width on beyerdynamic M 201 ◉ vs Shure SM57 ◉ and help others decide!
Package Depth
What is the package depth?
Who knows? 0Votes beyerdynamic M 201 (Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows? 0Votes Shure SM57 (Help us out by suggesting one!)
The shipping package’s depth.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Package Depth on beyerdynamic M 201 ◉ vs Shure SM57 ◉ and help others decide!
Package Height
What is the package height?
Who knows? 0Votes beyerdynamic M 201 (Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows? 0Votes Shure SM57 (Help us out by suggesting one!)
The shipping package’s height.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Package Height on beyerdynamic M 201 ◉ vs Shure SM57 ◉ and help others decide!
Cable Length
What is the cable length?
Who knows? 0Votes beyerdynamic M 201 (Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows? 0Votes Shure SM57 (Help us out by suggesting one!)
Length of the included or integrated cable.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Cable Length on beyerdynamic M 201 ◉ vs Shure SM57 ◉ and help others decide!
Stand/Arm Length
What is the stand/arm length?
Who knows? 0Votes beyerdynamic M 201 (Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows? 0Votes Shure SM57 (Help us out by suggesting one!)
Maximum length of included stand or boom arm.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Stand/Arm Length on beyerdynamic M 201 ◉ vs Shure SM57 ◉ and help others decide!
Capsule Length
What is the capsule length?
Who knows? 0Votes beyerdynamic M 201 (Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows? 0Votes Shure SM57 (Help us out by suggesting one!)
The length of the microphone capsule.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Capsule Length on beyerdynamic M 201 ◉ vs Shure SM57 ◉ and help others decide!
Base Footprint Diameter
What is the base/stand footprint diameter?
Who knows? 0Votes beyerdynamic M 201 (Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows? 0Votes Shure SM57 (Help us out by suggesting one!)
Diameter of the microphone base or stand footprint.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Base Footprint Diameter on beyerdynamic M 201 ◉ vs Shure SM57 ◉ and help others decide!
Who knows? 0Votes Shure SM57 (Help us out by suggesting one!)
vs Minimum Terminating Impedance
beyerdynamic M 201 specifies a Minimum Terminating Impedance of 1000 Ω, but the Shure SM57 does not provide this value. The M 201's relatively high impedance suggests compatibility with certain preamps and could influence tone.
The minimum load impedance required for optimal microphone performance and to avoid signal distortion.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Minimum Terminating Impedance on beyerdynamic M 201 ◉ vs Shure SM57 ◉ and help others decide!
Who knows? 0Votes beyerdynamic M 201 (Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows? 0Votes Shure SM57 (Help us out by suggesting one!)
The SPL level where overload occurs.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Overload Point on beyerdynamic M 201 ◉ vs Shure SM57 ◉ and help others decide!
Frequency Response (Min)
What is the minimum frequency response?
40 Hz 0Votes
40 Hz 0Votes
beyerdynamic M 201
Reaches low enough to capture warmth from toms and guitar amps, but not full sub-bass like a kick mic.
Shure SM57
This range covers most vocal and instrumental frequencies, ensuring clear, full sound from lower bass to high treble.
The lowest frequency the mic can capture.
In the battle of Frequency Response (Min), beyerdynamic M 201 ◉ is same as Shure SM57 ◉ , delivering equal 40.00 Hz measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Frequency Response (Min) on beyerdynamic M 201 ◉ vs Shure SM57 ◉ and help others decide!
Frequency Response (Max)
What is the maximum frequency response?
18,000 Hz 0Votes
15,000 Hz 0Votes
beyerdynamic M 201
Extends up to 18 kHz, covering the clarity range for vocals, cymbals, and acoustic detail.
Shure SM57
A wide frequency response that allows the SM57 to capture high-frequency details without distortion, making it great for both vocals and instruments.
The highest frequency the mic can capture.
In the battle of Frequency Response (Max), beyerdynamic M 201 ◉ is better than Shure SM57 ◉ , delivering higher 3,000.0 Hz measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Frequency Response (Max) on beyerdynamic M 201 ◉ vs Shure SM57 ◉ and help others decide!
Sensitivity
What is the sensitivity?
-58 dBV/Pa 0Votes
-54.5 dBV/Pa 0Votes
beyerdynamic M 201
This is relatively low sensitivity, so it works best with a preamp or interface that has decent gain.
Shure SM57
The sensitivity of -54.5 dBV/Pa is typical for dynamic microphones, ensuring robust sound reproduction.
Output level relative to sound pressure.
In the battle of Sensitivity, beyerdynamic M 201 ◉ is worse than Shure SM57 ◉ , delivering lower 3.5 dBV/Pa measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Sensitivity on beyerdynamic M 201 ◉ vs Shure SM57 ◉ and help others decide!
Output Impedance
What is the output impedance?
200 ohm 0Votes
310 ohm 0Votes
beyerdynamic M 201
A common value for dynamic mics, making it resistant to long cable runs without losing tone.
Shure SM57
Impedance of 310 ohms is a common specification for professional dynamic microphones, ensuring compatibility with most audio equipment.
Electrical resistance of the microphone’s output.
In the battle of Output Impedance, beyerdynamic M 201 ◉ is better than Shure SM57 ◉ , delivering lower 110.0 ohm measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Output Impedance on beyerdynamic M 201 ◉ vs Shure SM57 ◉ and help others decide!
Directionality
What is the directionality?
26 beyerdynamic M 201 0Votes Unidirectional
49 Shure SM57 0Votes Unidirectional
Shure SM57
A unidirectional (cardioid) microphone picks up sound from one direction, making it excellent for focused audio capture, especially in noisy environments.
General pickup orientation.
In the battle of Directionality, beyerdynamic M 201 ◉ is worse than Shure SM57 ◉ , delivering lower 23 score measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Directionality on beyerdynamic M 201 ◉ vs Shure SM57 ◉ and help others decide!
Microphone Type
What is the microphone type?
76 beyerdynamic M 201 0Votes Dynamic
49 Shure SM57 0Votes Dynamic
Defines the operating principle of the microphone.
In the battle of Microphone Type, beyerdynamic M 201 ◉ is better than Shure SM57 ◉ , delivering higher 27 score measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Microphone Type on beyerdynamic M 201 ◉ vs Shure SM57 ◉ and help others decide!
Capsule Type
What is the capsule type?
60 beyerdynamic M 201 0Votes Small Diaphragm
Who knows? 0Votes Shure SM57 (Help us out by suggesting one!)
Specifies the capsule style that influences sound capture.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Capsule Type on beyerdynamic M 201 ◉ vs Shure SM57 ◉ and help others decide!
Signal-to-Noise Ratio
What is the SNR?
Who knows? 0Votes beyerdynamic M 201 (Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows? 0Votes Shure SM57 (Help us out by suggesting one!)
The clarity ratio between signal and background noise.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Signal-to-Noise Ratio on beyerdynamic M 201 ◉ vs Shure SM57 ◉ and help others decide!
Dynamic Range
What is the dynamic range?
Who knows? 0Votes beyerdynamic M 201 (Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows? 0Votes Shure SM57 (Help us out by suggesting one!)
The range between quietest and loudest sounds captured.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Dynamic Range on beyerdynamic M 201 ◉ vs Shure SM57 ◉ and help others decide!
Max SPL
What is the maximum SPL?
Who knows? 0Votes beyerdynamic M 201 (Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows? 0Votes Shure SM57 (Help us out by suggesting one!)
The maximum loudness before distortion.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Max SPL on beyerdynamic M 201 ◉ vs Shure SM57 ◉ and help others decide!
Equivalent Noise Level
What is the equivalent noise level?
Who knows? 0Votes beyerdynamic M 201 (Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows? 0Votes Shure SM57 (Help us out by suggesting one!)
The self-noise generated by the microphone.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Equivalent Noise Level on beyerdynamic M 201 ◉ vs Shure SM57 ◉ and help others decide!
THD
What is the THD (total Harmonic Distortion)?
Who knows? 0Votes beyerdynamic M 201 (Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows? 0Votes Shure SM57 (Help us out by suggesting one!)
Distortion added at high volumes.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the THD on beyerdynamic M 201 ◉ vs Shure SM57 ◉ and help others decide!
Pre-Attenuation Pad
What is the pre-attenuation pad?
Who knows? 0Votes beyerdynamic M 201 (Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows? 0Votes Shure SM57 (Help us out by suggesting one!)
Built-in reduction for handling loud signals.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Pre-Attenuation Pad on beyerdynamic M 201 ◉ vs Shure SM57 ◉ and help others decide!
Low-Cut Filter
What is the low-cut filter cutoff?
Who knows? 0Votes beyerdynamic M 201 (Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows? 0Votes Shure SM57 (Help us out by suggesting one!)
Removes low-end rumble.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Low-Cut Filter on beyerdynamic M 201 ◉ vs Shure SM57 ◉ and help others decide!
Stereo/Mono Mode
What mode is supported?
6 beyerdynamic M 201 0Votes Mono
9 Shure SM57 0Votes Mono
Determines recording mode.
In the battle of Stereo/Mono Mode, beyerdynamic M 201 ◉ is worse than Shure SM57 ◉ , delivering lower 3 score measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Stereo/Mono Mode on beyerdynamic M 201 ◉ vs Shure SM57 ◉ and help others decide!
Voice Isolation Feature
Does it have voice isolation?
Yes 0Votes beyerdynamic M 201
No 0Votes Shure SM57
Whether the mic includes isolation tech.
In the battle of Voice Isolation Feature, beyerdynamic M 201 ◉ is better than Shure SM57 ◉ , delivering higher 6 score measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Voice Isolation Feature on beyerdynamic M 201 ◉ vs Shure SM57 ◉ and help others decide!
Acoustic Principle
What is the acoustic principle?
56 beyerdynamic M 201 0Votes Pressure Gradient
59 Shure SM57 0Votes Pressure Gradient
The underlying sound capture mechanism.
In the battle of Acoustic Principle, beyerdynamic M 201 ◉ is worse than Shure SM57 ◉ , delivering lower 3 score measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Acoustic Principle on beyerdynamic M 201 ◉ vs Shure SM57 ◉ and help others decide!
Headroom
What is the headroom?
Who knows? 0Votes beyerdynamic M 201 (Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows? 0Votes Shure SM57 (Help us out by suggesting one!)
Range above nominal operating level before distortion.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Headroom on beyerdynamic M 201 ◉ vs Shure SM57 ◉ and help others decide!
Transient Response
What is the transient response?
86 beyerdynamic M 201 0Votes Fast
89 Shure SM57 0Votes Fast
Ability to capture sudden sound changes.
In the battle of Transient Response, beyerdynamic M 201 ◉ is worse than Shure SM57 ◉ , delivering lower 3 score measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Transient Response on beyerdynamic M 201 ◉ vs Shure SM57 ◉ and help others decide!
Proximity Effect Control
Does it have proximity effect control?
No 0Votes beyerdynamic M 201
No 0Votes Shure SM57
vs Proximity Effect Control
Neither beyerdynamic M 201 nor Shure SM57 supports Proximity Effect Control, limiting user's ability to adjust bass boost caused by close miking. Both microphones require manual technique adjustment for proximity effects.
Whether it has control for bass buildup at close range.
In the battle of Proximity Effect Control, beyerdynamic M 201 ◉ is same as Shure SM57 ◉ .
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Proximity Effect Control on beyerdynamic M 201 ◉ vs Shure SM57 ◉ and help others decide!
Acoustic Noise Isolation Rating
What is the acoustic noise isolation rating?
Who knows? 0Votes beyerdynamic M 201 (Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows? 0Votes Shure SM57 (Help us out by suggesting one!)
Rating for rejecting ambient noise.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Acoustic Noise Isolation Rating on beyerdynamic M 201 ◉ vs Shure SM57 ◉ and help others decide!
Polar Pattern Switching Precision
What is the switching precision?
Who knows? 0Votes beyerdynamic M 201 (Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows? 0Votes Shure SM57 (Help us out by suggesting one!)
The accuracy of selectable polar patterns.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Polar Pattern Switching Precision on beyerdynamic M 201 ◉ vs Shure SM57 ◉ and help others decide!
Output Level
What is the output level?
-58 dBV/Pa 0Votes
Who knows? 0Votes Shure SM57 (Help us out by suggesting one!)
The output voltage relative to input pressure.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Output Level on beyerdynamic M 201 ◉ vs Shure SM57 ◉ and help others decide!
Internal Preamp Quality
What is the internal preamp quality?
Who knows? 0Votes beyerdynamic M 201 (Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows? 0Votes Shure SM57 (Help us out by suggesting one!)
Describes the built-in preamp’s fidelity.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Internal Preamp Quality on beyerdynamic M 201 ◉ vs Shure SM57 ◉ and help others decide!
Transformer/Transformerless Design
What design does it use?
86 beyerdynamic M 201 0Votes Transformerless
59 Shure SM57 0Votes Transformer
The electrical coupling approach used.
In the battle of Transformer/Transformerless Design, beyerdynamic M 201 ◉ is better than Shure SM57 ◉ , delivering higher 27 score measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Transformer/Transformerless Design on beyerdynamic M 201 ◉ vs Shure SM57 ◉ and help others decide!
beyerdynamic M 201 offers a detachable cable, enhancing ease of cable replacement or customization. In contrast, the Shure SM57 does not have a detachable cable, potentially limiting long-term repair options.
Whether the cable can be detached or replaced.
In the battle of Cable Detachable, beyerdynamic M 201 ◉ is better than Shure SM57 ◉ , delivering higher 6 score measurement.
Based on community votes for Cable Detachable, beyerdynamic M 201 ◉ earned 1 votes, more than Shure SM57 ◉, which got 0 votes.
Detachable cable on the beyerdynamic M 201 is super convenient when cables wear out, so I'm leaning towards that feature instead of the fixed cable on the SM57.
Both beyerdynamic M 201 and Shure SM57 utilize an XLR connection interface, ensuring professional standard connectivity for balanced audio transmission and compatibility with most audio equipment.
Defines the main interface for connectivity.
In the battle of Connection Interface, beyerdynamic M 201 ◉ is better than Shure SM57 ◉ , delivering higher 7 score measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Connection Interface on beyerdynamic M 201 ◉ vs Shure SM57 ◉ and help others decide!
Who knows? 0Votes beyerdynamic M 201 (Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows? 0Votes Shure SM57 (Help us out by suggesting one!)
Frequency spectrum range for mics.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the RF Frequency Range on beyerdynamic M 201 ◉ vs Shure SM57 ◉ and help others decide!
Phantom Power Support
Does it support phantom power?
No 0Votes beyerdynamic M 201
No 0Votes Shure SM57
Shure SM57
As a dynamic mic, it does not require phantom power, which is typical for condenser microphones.
Whether the mic supports phantom power.
In the battle of Phantom Power Support, beyerdynamic M 201 ◉ is same as Shure SM57 ◉ .
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Phantom Power Support on beyerdynamic M 201 ◉ vs Shure SM57 ◉ and help others decide!
Wireless Technology
What wireless technology is used?
Who knows? 0Votes beyerdynamic M 201 (Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows? 0Votes Shure SM57 (Help us out by suggesting one!)
The wireless system type used.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Wireless Technology on beyerdynamic M 201 ◉ vs Shure SM57 ◉ and help others decide!
USB Compatibility
What USB versions are compatible?
Who knows? 0Votes beyerdynamic M 201 (Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows? 0Votes Shure SM57 (Help us out by suggesting one!)
Identifies supported USB standards.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the USB Compatibility on beyerdynamic M 201 ◉ vs Shure SM57 ◉ and help others decide!
Audio Output Options
What are the audio output options?
31 beyerdynamic M 201 0Votes Analog, Balanced
90 Shure SM57 0Votes Analog
Lists output signal formats available.
In the battle of Audio Output Options, beyerdynamic M 201 ◉ is worse than Shure SM57 ◉ , delivering lower 59 score measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Audio Output Options on beyerdynamic M 201 ◉ vs Shure SM57 ◉ and help others decide!
Interface Latency
What is the interface latency?
Who knows? 0Votes beyerdynamic M 201 (Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows? 0Votes Shure SM57 (Help us out by suggesting one!)
Latency introduced by the interface.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Interface Latency on beyerdynamic M 201 ◉ vs Shure SM57 ◉ and help others decide!
Multi-Device Pairing
Does it support multi-device pairing?
No 0Votes beyerdynamic M 201
No 0Votes Shure SM57
Ability to connect to multiple devices simultaneously.
In the battle of Multi-Device Pairing, beyerdynamic M 201 ◉ is same as Shure SM57 ◉ .
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Multi-Device Pairing on beyerdynamic M 201 ◉ vs Shure SM57 ◉ and help others decide!
Balanced/Unbalanced Output
What is the output type?
86 beyerdynamic M 201 0Votes Balanced
88 Shure SM57 0Votes Balanced
Defines the type of electrical signal output.
In the battle of Balanced/Unbalanced Output, beyerdynamic M 201 ◉ is worse than Shure SM57 ◉ , delivering lower 2 score measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Balanced/Unbalanced Output on beyerdynamic M 201 ◉ vs Shure SM57 ◉ and help others decide!
Dual Output Capability
Does it have dual output capability?
No 0Votes beyerdynamic M 201
No 0Votes Shure SM57
Ability to provide two simultaneous outputs.
In the battle of Dual Output Capability, beyerdynamic M 201 ◉ is same as Shure SM57 ◉ .
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Dual Output Capability on beyerdynamic M 201 ◉ vs Shure SM57 ◉ and help others decide!
XLR Pin Configuration
What is the XLR pin configuration?
16 beyerdynamic M 201 0Votes Standard
89 Shure SM57 0Votes Standard
Specifies XLR wiring configuration.
In the battle of XLR Pin Configuration, beyerdynamic M 201 ◉ is worse than Shure SM57 ◉ , delivering lower 73 score measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the XLR Pin Configuration on beyerdynamic M 201 ◉ vs Shure SM57 ◉ and help others decide!
Ground Lift Switch
Does it have a ground lift switch?
No 0Votes beyerdynamic M 201
No 0Votes Shure SM57
Prevents ground loop hum in audio systems.
In the battle of Ground Lift Switch, beyerdynamic M 201 ◉ is same as Shure SM57 ◉ .
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Ground Lift Switch on beyerdynamic M 201 ◉ vs Shure SM57 ◉ and help others decide!
Shielding Against RF Interference
Is there RF shielding?
Yes 0Votes beyerdynamic M 201
No 0Votes Shure SM57
Indicates built-in protection against RF interference.
In the battle of Shielding Against RF Interference, beyerdynamic M 201 ◉ is better than Shure SM57 ◉ , delivering higher 4 score measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Shielding Against RF Interference on beyerdynamic M 201 ◉ vs Shure SM57 ◉ and help others decide!
Power Source for both beyerdynamic M 201 and Shure SM57 is Passive, meaning neither requires external or battery power, simplifying setup and reducing maintenance.
Defines how the microphone is powered.
In the battle of Power Source, beyerdynamic M 201 ◉ is worse than Shure SM57 ◉ , delivering lower 75 score measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Power Source on beyerdynamic M 201 ◉ vs Shure SM57 ◉ and help others decide!
External Power Supply Compatibility is not available for either beyerdynamic M 201 or Shure SM57; both function without external power supplies, suitable for standard wired microphone use.
Can the mic run on external AC/DC supply.
In the battle of External Power Supply Compatibility, beyerdynamic M 201 ◉ is same as Shure SM57 ◉ .
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the External Power Supply Compatibility on beyerdynamic M 201 ◉ vs Shure SM57 ◉ and help others decide!
Power Indicator Light is absent on both beyerdynamic M 201 and Shure SM57, as these passive microphones do not require power indication.
Whether a light shows power/battery status.
In the battle of Power Indicator Light, beyerdynamic M 201 ◉ is same as Shure SM57 ◉ .
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Power Indicator Light on beyerdynamic M 201 ◉ vs Shure SM57 ◉ and help others decide!
Phantom Power Requirement
What is the phantom power requirement?
Who knows? 0Votes beyerdynamic M 201 (Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows? 0Votes Shure SM57 (Help us out by suggesting one!)
Specifies the phantom power voltage needed.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Phantom Power Requirement on beyerdynamic M 201 ◉ vs Shure SM57 ◉ and help others decide!
Battery Life
What is the battery life?
Who knows? 0Votes beyerdynamic M 201 (Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows? 0Votes Shure SM57 (Help us out by suggesting one!)
How long the microphone operates per charge.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Battery Life on beyerdynamic M 201 ◉ vs Shure SM57 ◉ and help others decide!
Recharge Time
What is the recharge time?
Who knows? 0Votes beyerdynamic M 201 (Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows? 0Votes Shure SM57 (Help us out by suggesting one!)
Time required to fully recharge the battery.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Recharge Time on beyerdynamic M 201 ◉ vs Shure SM57 ◉ and help others decide!
Power Consumption
What is the power consumption?
Who knows? 0Votes beyerdynamic M 201 (Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows? 0Votes Shure SM57 (Help us out by suggesting one!)
Amount of power drawn during use.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Power Consumption on beyerdynamic M 201 ◉ vs Shure SM57 ◉ and help others decide!
Auto Power-Off
Does it have auto power-off?
No 0Votes beyerdynamic M 201
No 0Votes Shure SM57
Whether the microphone shuts down automatically when idle.
In the battle of Auto Power-Off, beyerdynamic M 201 ◉ is same as Shure SM57 ◉ .
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Auto Power-Off on beyerdynamic M 201 ◉ vs Shure SM57 ◉ and help others decide!
Charging Method
What is the charging method?
Who knows? 0Votes beyerdynamic M 201 (Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows? 0Votes Shure SM57 (Help us out by suggesting one!)
The interface used for recharging.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Charging Method on beyerdynamic M 201 ◉ vs Shure SM57 ◉ and help others decide!
Replaceable Battery Support
Does it support replaceable batteries?
No 0Votes beyerdynamic M 201
No 0Votes Shure SM57
Indicates if batteries can be swapped.
In the battle of Replaceable Battery Support, beyerdynamic M 201 ◉ is same as Shure SM57 ◉ .
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Replaceable Battery Support on beyerdynamic M 201 ◉ vs Shure SM57 ◉ and help others decide!
Mute Function is absent in both beyerdynamic M 201 and Shure SM57. Users must rely on external mixers or interfaces to mute audio signals from these microphones.
Ability to mute audio directly on the mic.
In the battle of Mute Function, beyerdynamic M 201 ◉ is same as Shure SM57 ◉ .
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Mute Function on beyerdynamic M 201 ◉ vs Shure SM57 ◉ and help others decide!
Neither beyerdynamic M 201 nor Shure SM57 offers App or Software Integration, so advanced digital control via apps isn't available on these models.
Works with companion apps or software.
In the battle of App/Software Integration, beyerdynamic M 201 ◉ is same as Shure SM57 ◉ .
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the App/Software Integration on beyerdynamic M 201 ◉ vs Shure SM57 ◉ and help others decide!
On/Off Switch
Does it include an on/off switch?
No 0Votes beyerdynamic M 201
No 0Votes Shure SM57
Shure SM57
Lacks an on/off switch, which is common for professional dynamic microphones, as it relies on the connected audio equipment for operation.
Whether the microphone includes a physical on/off switch.
In the battle of On/Off Switch, beyerdynamic M 201 ◉ is same as Shure SM57 ◉ .
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the On/Off Switch on beyerdynamic M 201 ◉ vs Shure SM57 ◉ and help others decide!
Gain Control
Does it have gain control?
No 0Votes beyerdynamic M 201
No 0Votes Shure SM57
Ability to adjust input gain directly.
In the battle of Gain Control, beyerdynamic M 201 ◉ is same as Shure SM57 ◉ .
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Gain Control on beyerdynamic M 201 ◉ vs Shure SM57 ◉ and help others decide!
Headphone Monitoring
Does it support headphone monitoring?
No 0Votes beyerdynamic M 201
No 0Votes Shure SM57
Direct monitoring via headphone output.
In the battle of Headphone Monitoring, beyerdynamic M 201 ◉ is same as Shure SM57 ◉ .
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Headphone Monitoring on beyerdynamic M 201 ◉ vs Shure SM57 ◉ and help others decide!
Monitoring Mix Control
Does it have monitoring mix control?
No 0Votes beyerdynamic M 201
No 0Votes Shure SM57
Lets user adjust mic vs playback audio mix.
In the battle of Monitoring Mix Control, beyerdynamic M 201 ◉ is same as Shure SM57 ◉ .
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Monitoring Mix Control on beyerdynamic M 201 ◉ vs Shure SM57 ◉ and help others decide!
Touch/Motion Controls
Does it support touch/motion controls?
No 0Votes beyerdynamic M 201
No 0Votes Shure SM57
Allows interaction via touch gestures or motion.
In the battle of Touch/Motion Controls, beyerdynamic M 201 ◉ is same as Shure SM57 ◉ .
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Touch/Motion Controls on beyerdynamic M 201 ◉ vs Shure SM57 ◉ and help others decide!
EQ Presets
Does it have EQ presets?
No 0Votes beyerdynamic M 201
No 0Votes Shure SM57
Pre-configured equalization modes.
In the battle of EQ Presets, beyerdynamic M 201 ◉ is same as Shure SM57 ◉ .
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the EQ Presets on beyerdynamic M 201 ◉ vs Shure SM57 ◉ and help others decide!
Voice Effects
Does it include voice effects?
No 0Votes beyerdynamic M 201
No 0Votes Shure SM57
Built-in voice modulation effects.
In the battle of Voice Effects, beyerdynamic M 201 ◉ is same as Shure SM57 ◉ .
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Voice Effects on beyerdynamic M 201 ◉ vs Shure SM57 ◉ and help others decide!
Feedback Suppression
Does it have feedback suppression?
No 0Votes beyerdynamic M 201
No 0Votes Shure SM57
Prevents audio feedback loops in live use.
In the battle of Feedback Suppression, beyerdynamic M 201 ◉ is same as Shure SM57 ◉ .
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Feedback Suppression on beyerdynamic M 201 ◉ vs Shure SM57 ◉ and help others decide!
Automatic Gain Adjustment
Does it support automatic gain adjustment?
No 0Votes beyerdynamic M 201
No 0Votes Shure SM57
Auto-adjusts mic gain for consistent output.
In the battle of Automatic Gain Adjustment, beyerdynamic M 201 ◉ is same as Shure SM57 ◉ .
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Automatic Gain Adjustment on beyerdynamic M 201 ◉ vs Shure SM57 ◉ and help others decide!
Multi-Mode Switch
Does the microphone have a multi-mode switch?
No 0Votes beyerdynamic M 201
No 0Votes Shure SM57
Shows whether the microphone includes a switch to toggle between different recording modes or polar patterns.
In the battle of Multi-Mode Switch, beyerdynamic M 201 ◉ is same as Shure SM57 ◉ .
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Multi-Mode Switch on beyerdynamic M 201 ◉ vs Shure SM57 ◉ and help others decide!
One-touch Recording Button
Does it have a one-touch recording button?
No 0Votes beyerdynamic M 201
No 0Votes Shure SM57
A single button to start recording instantly.
In the battle of One-touch Recording Button, beyerdynamic M 201 ◉ is same as Shure SM57 ◉ .
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the One-touch Recording Button on beyerdynamic M 201 ◉ vs Shure SM57 ◉ and help others decide!
Lock Mode
Does it have a lock mode?
No 0Votes beyerdynamic M 201
No 0Votes Shure SM57
Prevents accidental control changes.
In the battle of Lock Mode, beyerdynamic M 201 ◉ is same as Shure SM57 ◉ .
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Lock Mode on beyerdynamic M 201 ◉ vs Shure SM57 ◉ and help others decide!
Programmable Button Functions
Can buttons be programmed?
No 0Votes beyerdynamic M 201
No 0Votes Shure SM57
Allows customizing buttons to user preference.
In the battle of Programmable Button Functions, beyerdynamic M 201 ◉ is same as Shure SM57 ◉ .
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Programmable Button Functions on beyerdynamic M 201 ◉ vs Shure SM57 ◉ and help others decide!
Sensitivity Preset Profiles
Does it have sensitivity presets?
No 0Votes beyerdynamic M 201
No 0Votes Shure SM57
Predefined sensitivity levels for various uses.
In the battle of Sensitivity Preset Profiles, beyerdynamic M 201 ◉ is same as Shure SM57 ◉ .
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Sensitivity Preset Profiles on beyerdynamic M 201 ◉ vs Shure SM57 ◉ and help others decide!
Drop resistance is crucial for rugged use and since the Shure SM57 has this feature while M 201 doesn't, my pick is definitely the SM57 for durability.
Honestly the lack of a swivel or pivot on the M 201 is a bummer for on-the-fly stage adjustments so I gotta go with the Shure SM57 for that kind of flexibility.
States whether the capsule uses a neodymium magnet for stability.
In the battle of Neodymium Magnet, beyerdynamic M 201 ◉ is same as Shure SM57 ◉ .
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Neodymium Magnet on beyerdynamic M 201 ◉ vs Shure SM57 ◉ and help others decide!
Body Material
What is the body material?
36 beyerdynamic M 201 0Votes Metal
90 Shure SM57 0Votes Metal
Shure SM57
The durable metal construction ensures long-term reliability and robustness, able to withstand the rigors of both studio and live performance environments.
The main structural material of the microphone body.
In the battle of Body Material, beyerdynamic M 201 ◉ is worse than Shure SM57 ◉ , delivering lower 54 score measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Body Material on beyerdynamic M 201 ◉ vs Shure SM57 ◉ and help others decide!
Shock Mount
Is a shock mount included?
No 0Votes beyerdynamic M 201
Yes 0Votes Shure SM57
Shure SM57
Includes a shock mount to reduce unwanted vibrations and noise during recording or live performances.
Whether a shock mount is included to reduce vibrations.
In the battle of Shock Mount, beyerdynamic M 201 ◉ is worse than Shure SM57 ◉ .
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Shock Mount on beyerdynamic M 201 ◉ vs Shure SM57 ◉ and help others decide!
Grill Material
What is the grill material?
46 beyerdynamic M 201 0Votes Metal
88 Shure SM57 0Votes Steel
Shure SM57
Steel grill adds to the microphone’s durability and helps protect the internal components from damage during use.
The material of the protective mic grill.
In the battle of Grill Material, beyerdynamic M 201 ◉ is worse than Shure SM57 ◉ , delivering lower 42 score measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Grill Material on beyerdynamic M 201 ◉ vs Shure SM57 ◉ and help others decide!
Internal Shockmount
Is there an internal shockmount for the capsule?
No 0Votes beyerdynamic M 201
Yes 0Votes Shure SM57
Shure SM57
An internal shockmount absorbs handling noise and vibrations, enhancing the clarity of recordings or live sound.
Capsule isolation that reduces handling noise.
In the battle of Internal Shockmount, beyerdynamic M 201 ◉ is worse than Shure SM57 ◉ .
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Internal Shockmount on beyerdynamic M 201 ◉ vs Shure SM57 ◉ and help others decide!
Finish/Coating
What finish/coating does it have?
26 beyerdynamic M 201 0Votes Matte
89 Shure SM57 0Votes Matte
Exterior treatment or surface finish.
In the battle of Finish/Coating, beyerdynamic M 201 ◉ is worse than Shure SM57 ◉ , delivering lower 63 score measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Finish/Coating on beyerdynamic M 201 ◉ vs Shure SM57 ◉ and help others decide!
Pop Filter
Is a pop filter included?
No 0Votes beyerdynamic M 201
No 0Votes Shure SM57
Whether a pop filter is provided for plosive reduction.
In the battle of Pop Filter, beyerdynamic M 201 ◉ is same as Shure SM57 ◉ .
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Pop Filter on beyerdynamic M 201 ◉ vs Shure SM57 ◉ and help others decide!
Windscreen
Is a windscreen included?
No 0Votes beyerdynamic M 201
No 0Votes Shure SM57
Whether a windscreen is included for wind noise control.
In the battle of Windscreen, beyerdynamic M 201 ◉ is same as Shure SM57 ◉ .
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Windscreen on beyerdynamic M 201 ◉ vs Shure SM57 ◉ and help others decide!
Water Resistance
Is it water resistant?
No 0Votes beyerdynamic M 201
No 0Votes Shure SM57
Indicates if the mic is resistant to water.
In the battle of Water Resistance, beyerdynamic M 201 ◉ is same as Shure SM57 ◉ .
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Water Resistance on beyerdynamic M 201 ◉ vs Shure SM57 ◉ and help others decide!
Dust Resistance
Is it dust resistant?
No 0Votes beyerdynamic M 201
No 0Votes Shure SM57
Indicates if the mic is resistant to dust.
In the battle of Dust Resistance, beyerdynamic M 201 ◉ is same as Shure SM57 ◉ .
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Dust Resistance on beyerdynamic M 201 ◉ vs Shure SM57 ◉ and help others decide!
Foldable Design
Is it foldable?
No 0Votes beyerdynamic M 201
No 0Votes Shure SM57
Indicates if the mic or its stand can fold for portability.
In the battle of Foldable Design, beyerdynamic M 201 ◉ is same as Shure SM57 ◉ .
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Foldable Design on beyerdynamic M 201 ◉ vs Shure SM57 ◉ and help others decide!
Internal Dampening Material
What is the internal dampening material?
65 beyerdynamic M 201 0Votes Foam
87 Shure SM57 0Votes Foam
The material used internally to reduce noise/vibration.
In the battle of Internal Dampening Material, beyerdynamic M 201 ◉ is worse than Shure SM57 ◉ , delivering lower 22 score measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Internal Dampening Material on beyerdynamic M 201 ◉ vs Shure SM57 ◉ and help others decide!
Heat Resistance Rating
What is the heat resistance rating?
Who knows? 0Votes beyerdynamic M 201 (Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows? 0Votes Shure SM57 (Help us out by suggesting one!)
Maximum heat level the mic can withstand.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Heat Resistance Rating on beyerdynamic M 201 ◉ vs Shure SM57 ◉ and help others decide!
Corrosion Resistance
Is it corrosion resistant?
Yes 0Votes beyerdynamic M 201
No 0Votes Shure SM57
Indicates if materials resist corrosion.
In the battle of Corrosion Resistance, beyerdynamic M 201 ◉ is better than Shure SM57 ◉ , delivering higher 6 score measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Corrosion Resistance on beyerdynamic M 201 ◉ vs Shure SM57 ◉ and help others decide!
Whether a clip for attaching to stands/instruments is included.
In the battle of Mounting Clip, beyerdynamic M 201 ◉ is worse than Shure SM57 ◉ , delivering lower 13 score measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Mounting Clip on beyerdynamic M 201 ◉ vs Shure SM57 ◉ and help others decide!
Adapters
Are adapters included?
Yes 0Votes beyerdynamic M 201
Yes 0Votes Shure SM57
beyerdynamic M 201
Specifically, the MA-CL 25 mic clamp with a thread insert (3/8" to 5/8") is supplied for stand compatibility.
States if adapter(s) are included (e.g., XLR to 3.5mm).
In the battle of Adapters, beyerdynamic M 201 ◉ is worse than Shure SM57 ◉ , delivering lower 13 score measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Adapters on beyerdynamic M 201 ◉ vs Shure SM57 ◉ and help others decide!
Packaging Type
What is the packaging type?
61 beyerdynamic M 201 0Votes Hard Case
85 Shure SM57 0Votes Box
beyerdynamic M 201
Unlike many stage mics that ship in cardboard or soft pouches, this comes in a proper hard case for safe storage.
Defines how the product is packaged.
In the battle of Packaging Type, beyerdynamic M 201 ◉ is worse than Shure SM57 ◉ , delivering lower 24 score measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Packaging Type on beyerdynamic M 201 ◉ vs Shure SM57 ◉ and help others decide!
Extra Windscreen
Is an extra windscreen included?
No 0Votes beyerdynamic M 201
No 0Votes Shure SM57
Indicates if a spare windscreen is included.
In the battle of Extra Windscreen, beyerdynamic M 201 ◉ is same as Shure SM57 ◉ .
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Extra Windscreen on beyerdynamic M 201 ◉ vs Shure SM57 ◉ and help others decide!
Instruction Manual
Is an instruction manual included?
Yes 0Votes beyerdynamic M 201
Yes 0Votes Shure SM57
Whether a manual or quick-start guide is included.
In the battle of Instruction Manual, beyerdynamic M 201 ◉ is worse than Shure SM57 ◉ , delivering lower 13 score measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Instruction Manual on beyerdynamic M 201 ◉ vs Shure SM57 ◉ and help others decide!
Spare Parts Availability
Are spare parts available?
Yes 0Votes beyerdynamic M 201
Yes 0Votes Shure SM57
Whether the manufacturer provides replacement parts.
In the battle of Spare Parts Availability, beyerdynamic M 201 ◉ is worse than Shure SM57 ◉ , delivering lower 16 score measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Spare Parts Availability on beyerdynamic M 201 ◉ vs Shure SM57 ◉ and help others decide!
Stickers/Branding
Are stickers/branding included?
No 0Votes beyerdynamic M 201
Yes 0Votes Shure SM57
Indicates if stickers or branded items are in the package.
In the battle of Stickers/Branding, beyerdynamic M 201 ◉ is worse than Shure SM57 ◉ .
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Stickers/Branding on beyerdynamic M 201 ◉ vs Shure SM57 ◉ and help others decide!
Warranty Card
Is a warranty card included?
Yes 0Votes beyerdynamic M 201
Yes 0Votes Shure SM57
Whether a warranty card is included.
In the battle of Warranty Card, beyerdynamic M 201 ◉ is worse than Shure SM57 ◉ , delivering lower 13 score measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Warranty Card on beyerdynamic M 201 ◉ vs Shure SM57 ◉ and help others decide!
Protective Foam Insert
Is protective foam included?
Yes 0Votes beyerdynamic M 201
Yes 0Votes Shure SM57
Indicates if protective foam is part of packaging.
In the battle of Protective Foam Insert, beyerdynamic M 201 ◉ is worse than Shure SM57 ◉ , delivering lower 13 score measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Protective Foam Insert on beyerdynamic M 201 ◉ vs Shure SM57 ◉ and help others decide!
Optional Windshield Model
What is the recommended windshield model?
34 beyerdynamic M 201 0Votes WS101
Who knows? 0Votes Shure SM57 (Help us out by suggesting one!)
Manufacturer-recommended windshield model.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Optional Windshield Model on beyerdynamic M 201 ◉ vs Shure SM57 ◉ and help others decide!
This product is designed to meet environmental standards, contributing to sustainable manufacturing practices.
Compliance with eco/environmental regulations.
In the battle of Environmental Compliance, beyerdynamic M 201 ◉ is worse than Shure SM57 ◉ , delivering lower 17 score measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Environmental Compliance on beyerdynamic M 201 ◉ vs Shure SM57 ◉ and help others decide!
Professional Broadcast Certification
Is it broadcast certified?
No 0Votes beyerdynamic M 201
Yes 1Votes Shure SM57
Shure SM57
Certified for professional broadcast use, the SM57 is a reliable choice for radio and TV stations, podcasts, and other broadcast settings.
Indicates if the mic meets pro broadcast standards.
In the battle of Professional Broadcast Certification, beyerdynamic M 201 ◉ is worse than Shure SM57 ◉ .
Based on community votes for Professional Broadcast Certification, beyerdynamic M 201 ◉ earned 0 votes, less than Shure SM57 ◉, which got 1 votes.
Professional broadcast certification on the SM57 seals the deal for me as it confirms the microphone meets industry standards which the beyerdynamic lacks.
See more
FCC/CE Approval
Is it FCC/CE approved?
Yes 0Votes beyerdynamic M 201
Yes 0Votes Shure SM57
Shure SM57
Compliant with FCC and CE standards, ensuring that it meets safety and electromagnetic compatibility regulations for use in the U.S. and Europe.
Explicit FCC/CE compliance approval.
In the battle of FCC/CE Approval, beyerdynamic M 201 ◉ is worse than Shure SM57 ◉ , delivering lower 19 score measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the FCC/CE Approval on beyerdynamic M 201 ◉ vs Shure SM57 ◉ and help others decide!
RoHS Compliance
Is it RoHS compliant?
Yes 0Votes beyerdynamic M 201
Yes 0Votes Shure SM57
Shure SM57
The SM57 meets RoHS (Restriction of Hazardous Substances) standards, ensuring it's free from harmful materials like lead and mercury.
Restriction of Hazardous Substances directive compliance.
In the battle of RoHS Compliance, beyerdynamic M 201 ◉ is worse than Shure SM57 ◉ , delivering lower 17 score measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the RoHS Compliance on beyerdynamic M 201 ◉ vs Shure SM57 ◉ and help others decide!
Temperature Range (Operating)
What is the operating temperature range?
Who knows? 0Votes beyerdynamic M 201 (Help us out by suggesting one!)
86 Shure SM57 0Votes 0° to 134.6°F
Shure SM57
The SM57 can operate in a wide temperature range, from -18°C to 57°C (0°F to 134.6°F), making it ideal for various environments, from studios to outdoor events.
Operating temperature window for reliable use.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Temperature Range (Operating) on beyerdynamic M 201 ◉ vs Shure SM57 ◉ and help others decide!
Lacks beamforming technology, which is usually found in array microphones designed for conferences or advanced sound systems.
Uses mic arrays to focus on sound sources.
In the battle of Beamforming Technology, beyerdynamic M 201 ◉ is same as Shure SM57 ◉ .
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Beamforming Technology on beyerdynamic M 201 ◉ vs Shure SM57 ◉ and help others decide!
I appreciate the built-in hum-compensating coil on the beyerdynamic M 201 because it really helps cut down electrical noise in recordings making it preferable to me.
See more
Multi-Pattern Switching
Does it support multi-pattern switching?
No 0Votes beyerdynamic M 201
No 0Votes Shure SM57
Shure SM57
Does not support multi-pattern switching, which is typical for most dynamic microphones that specialize in cardioid recording.
Ability to switch between multiple pickup patterns.
In the battle of Multi-Pattern Switching, beyerdynamic M 201 ◉ is same as Shure SM57 ◉ .
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Multi-Pattern Switching on beyerdynamic M 201 ◉ vs Shure SM57 ◉ and help others decide!
DSP Processing
Does it include DSP processing?
No 0Votes beyerdynamic M 201
No 0Votes Shure SM57
Shure SM57
Does not include DSP (Digital Signal Processing), as it's designed to deliver natural sound without added processing.
Built-in digital signal processing for sound shaping.
In the battle of DSP Processing, beyerdynamic M 201 ◉ is same as Shure SM57 ◉ .
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the DSP Processing on beyerdynamic M 201 ◉ vs Shure SM57 ◉ and help others decide!
AI Noise Cancellation
Does it feature AI noise cancellation?
No 0Votes beyerdynamic M 201
No 0Votes Shure SM57
Shure SM57
No AI-driven noise cancellation, but its cardioid polar pattern inherently minimizes background noise for clearer recordings.
AI-powered suppression of background noise.
In the battle of AI Noise Cancellation, beyerdynamic M 201 ◉ is same as Shure SM57 ◉ .
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the AI Noise Cancellation on beyerdynamic M 201 ◉ vs Shure SM57 ◉ and help others decide!
Recording Profiles
Does it have recording profiles?
No 0Votes beyerdynamic M 201
No 0Votes Shure SM57
Shure SM57
Does not offer preset recording profiles, focusing on providing a consistent and clear sound for general use.
Predefined sound settings for specific uses.
In the battle of Recording Profiles, beyerdynamic M 201 ◉ is same as Shure SM57 ◉ .
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Recording Profiles on beyerdynamic M 201 ◉ vs Shure SM57 ◉ and help others decide!
Auto Calibration
Does it support auto calibration?
No 0Votes beyerdynamic M 201
No 0Votes Shure SM57
Shure SM57
Lacks auto-calibration, as the SM57 is manually adjusted, which is common in professional dynamic microphones.
Automatically adjusts mic response to environment.
In the battle of Auto Calibration, beyerdynamic M 201 ◉ is same as Shure SM57 ◉ .
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Auto Calibration on beyerdynamic M 201 ◉ vs Shure SM57 ◉ and help others decide!
Low Latency Monitoring
Does it support low-latency monitoring?
No 0Votes beyerdynamic M 201
No 0Votes Shure SM57
Shure SM57
Does not offer low latency monitoring, as it is designed for direct sound capture rather than monitoring.
Provides near real-time monitoring with minimal delay.
In the battle of Low Latency Monitoring, beyerdynamic M 201 ◉ is same as Shure SM57 ◉ .
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Low Latency Monitoring on beyerdynamic M 201 ◉ vs Shure SM57 ◉ and help others decide!
Cloud Profile Storage
Does it support cloud profile storage?
No 0Votes beyerdynamic M 201
No 0Votes Shure SM57
Shure SM57
Does not support cloud profile storage, as it's a basic microphone designed for immediate use without additional tech features.
Saves mic settings to the cloud.
In the battle of Cloud Profile Storage, beyerdynamic M 201 ◉ is same as Shure SM57 ◉ .
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Cloud Profile Storage on beyerdynamic M 201 ◉ vs Shure SM57 ◉ and help others decide!
Firmware Upgrade Support
Does it support firmware upgrades?
No 0Votes beyerdynamic M 201
No 0Votes Shure SM57
Shure SM57
No firmware upgrades available, as the SM57 operates on a fixed design.
Ability to update functionality via firmware.
In the battle of Firmware Upgrade Support, beyerdynamic M 201 ◉ is same as Shure SM57 ◉ .
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Firmware Upgrade Support on beyerdynamic M 201 ◉ vs Shure SM57 ◉ and help others decide!
Acoustic Modeling/Room Simulation
Does it feature acoustic modeling?
No 0Votes beyerdynamic M 201
No 0Votes Shure SM57
Shure SM57
Does not include room simulation features, focusing purely on high-quality audio capture with minimal distortion.
Simulates room acoustics or mic characteristics.
In the battle of Acoustic Modeling/Room Simulation, beyerdynamic M 201 ◉ is same as Shure SM57 ◉ .
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Acoustic Modeling/Room Simulation on beyerdynamic M 201 ◉ vs Shure SM57 ◉ and help others decide!
Dual Capsule Blending
Does it support dual capsule blending?
No 0Votes beyerdynamic M 201
No 0Votes Shure SM57
Shure SM57
The SM57 does not feature dual capsule blending, focusing on capturing sound with its single dynamic capsule.
Blends outputs of dual capsules for tonal flexibility.
In the battle of Dual Capsule Blending, beyerdynamic M 201 ◉ is same as Shure SM57 ◉ .
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Dual Capsule Blending on beyerdynamic M 201 ◉ vs Shure SM57 ◉ and help others decide!
Smart Assistant Compatibility
Is it compatible with smart assistants?
Who knows? 0Votes beyerdynamic M 201 (Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows? 0Votes Shure SM57 (Help us out by suggesting one!)
Integration with voice assistants.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Smart Assistant Compatibility on beyerdynamic M 201 ◉ vs Shure SM57 ◉ and help others decide!
Surveys
Because hot takes deserve votes.
Sound Quality
How would you rate the sound quality of this microphone?
Crisp and professional
0Votes
0Votes
Good and clear
0Votes
0Votes
Average clarity
0Votes
0Votes
Distorted and unclear
0Votes
0Votes
Noise Handling
How well does this microphone handle background noise?
Blocks out most noise
0Votes
0Votes
Handles noise fairly well
0Votes
0Votes
Reduces some noise
0Votes
0Votes
Picks up everything
0Votes
0Votes
Battery Life
How long does the battery last on this microphone?
Excellent — Over 20 hours
0Votes
0Votes
Long lasting — 10 to 20 hours
0Votes
0Votes
Decent — 5 to 10 hours
0Votes
0Votes
Short — 2 to 5 hours
0Votes
0Votes
Very short — Under 2 hours
0Votes
0Votes
Durability
How durable is this microphone based on build and lifespan?
Highly durable — Over 4 years
0Votes
0Votes
Solid — 2 to 4 years
0Votes
0Votes
Average — 1 to 2 years
0Votes
0Votes
Very fragile — Less than 1 year
0Votes
0Votes
Weight
How heavy is this microphone?
Ultra-light — Under 150 grams
0Votes
0Votes
Lightweight — 150 to 300 grams
0Votes
0Votes
Medium — 300 to 500 grams
0Votes
0Votes
Heavy — 500 to 800 grams
0Votes
0Votes
Very heavy — Over 800 grams
0Votes
0Votes
Design Appeal
How attractive is the design of this microphone?
Plain and boring
0Votes
0Votes
Somewhat okay
0Votes
0Votes
Nice looking
0Votes
0Votes
Stylish and modern
0Votes
0Votes
Pricing
How do you feel about the price of this microphone?
Great value for money
0Votes
0Votes
Pretty good price
0Votes
0Votes
Fair deal
0Votes
0Votes
Kinda pricey
0Votes
0Votes
Crazy expensive
0Votes
0Votes
Sensitivity
How sensitive is this microphone to capturing sound?
Very sensitive — Detects quiet sounds clearly
0Votes
0Votes
Sensitive — Captures a wide sound range
0Votes
0Votes
Moderate — Picks up normal voice levels well
0Votes
0Votes
Low — Needs to be close to sound source
0Votes
0Votes
Very low — Struggles to capture soft voices
0Votes
0Votes
Frequency Response Range
What do you think about the frequency response range of this microphone?
Wide range — 20 Hz to 20 kHz
0Votes
0Votes
Good range — 30 Hz to 18 kHz
0Votes
0Votes
Decent range — 40 Hz to 16 kHz
0Votes
0Votes
Limited range — 50 Hz to 14 kHz
0Votes
0Votes
Narrow range — Above 60 Hz only
0Votes
0Votes
Connectivity
How stable and reliable is the connection of this microphone?
Supermod 
Moderator 
Recaptor 
0 Cartling 
19 
18 
18 
20 
13 
20 
